Who Has More Power in the Immediate, Short & Long Term? Gold Fundamentals or Gold Manipulators?

(the Monday post, a day late)

To begin, please like, comment and share this article if you want to maintain the free model of this newsletter for as long as possible. As long as readers keep liking, commenting and sharing my articles,, I will keep this newsletter free before moving it to a subscription model. I know last week I mentioned that I would release new articles every Monday and Wednesday morning, EST, and that will still be the model moving forward. I just had a particularly busy day yesterday, so here is the Monday article, a day late.

For years, when I started my journey in the analysis business twenty years ago, I would continually emphasize holding for the long game due to stellar fundamentals that existed regarding global supply and demand determinants of physical gold. Only years later into my analytical journey did I learn that the manipulation behavior of the banking cartel supersedes the majority, not all, but the majority of fundamentals in the behavior of gold prices.

For example, the pro-USD cartel that continually bashes the PBOC for manipulating the strength/weakness of the Yuan/RMB (which of course, they do), never acknowledges its much more powerful leverage in the game due to the USD still retaining a great deal of hegemony in global finance, of manipulating the USD for more than a century. So this is an example of the pot (the much larger influencer) calling the kettle (the much smaller, though growing, influencer) black for engaging in the exact same manipulation as itself, while never acknowledging its much larger role in the manipulation game. And this same anti-gold cartel also understands the value of holding physical over paper, and for this reason of understanding this, will HODL (to co-opt a term embraced by the crypto community) physical while shorting the gold and silver mining stocks (the main reason the PM mining stocks suffered an eighteen-month decline from 2020 to 2021).

If gold/silver/platinum assets only followed fundamentals, meaning the supply/demand determinants of the physical world, then we should have never experienced the 4-1/2 year bear that occurred between mid-2011 and the end of 2015 that is clearly visible in the below chart. By the way, for those that were among my very first patrons way back when, you will recognize the green circled area, when gold futures were trading at $1,180 when I stated gold assets were a screaming buy here and that gold would never retreat again to $1,000 per ounce even though the prevailing propaganda back then was that gold was going to crash to $500 to $600 an ounce and that gold was dead (sound familiar to the same propaganda being forwarded in 2022 anyone?). And furthermore, were gold prices simply driven by fundamentals, gold would not have remained in a consolidation pattern for the last eighteen months either. So I’ve clearly shown a period of 36-months during which prices either completely diverged from bullish fundamentals (mid-2011 to the end of 2015) or during which prices vacillated (mid-2020 to present day) during which prices clearly should have been climbing higher from a fundamental perspective.

To address those that state that gold prices have been following the fundamentals for the last three years, even though the supply/demand data most often quoted of the World Gold Council (WGC) is pure propaganda, of which I’ll prove in this article, for the sake of appeasing the fundamentals drive prices herd, let’s review the supply/demand data supplied by the WGC for the past three full years (2019-2021).

Even though the annual supply/demand gold figures reported by the WGC are likely highly propagandized and false (as I will make the case for in just a second), the “gold price follows fundamentals" arguments fails per the WGC data. From 2019 to 2020, global physical supply fell by 3.21%, global demand fell by a whopping 29.06% yoy, and using spot prices as a proxy for physical (because I can’t recall the exact prices of one troy ounce of gold at the end of 2019 and 2020), gold prices soared by 27.07%. Though some may argue that gold prices soared because of covid worries in 2020, even if this were true, because covid propaganda and not scientific truth dominated the mainstream media in covid reporting in 2020, this would still be a cause of manipulation, and not fundamentals, driving prices. Furthermore, were we to credit covid propaganda for the massive increase in gold prices in 2020, then we should have witnessed a higher percentage rise in 2021, because covid lockdowns became far more draconian in nature in 2021 (trust me, as I was subject to them) and covid propaganda and fear mongering intensified in 2021. Yet, prices barely rose in 2021.

Finally, if we look at the data released by the SGE (Shanghai Gold Exchange) in 2021 for their wholesale market as illustrated below, clearly either the WGC or the SGE is lying about China gold demand in 2021. Per data I extracted from global gold demand in 2021 from the WGC website, they reported mainland China retail gold demand at a lowly 960.1 metric tonnes for the entire year. However, the SGE reported wholesale demand in mainland China, per the above link, at a whopping 81.82% higher, at 1,745.7 metric tonnes.

Of course, all the wholesale gold demand in mainland China is not sold into the retail consumer market, but it is highly unlikely for the wholesale gold demand of mainland China to exceed the retail consumer demand by near 82%, as wholesale demand, during the course of the year would be adjusted accordingly to monthly retail consumer demand. Unless wholesalers expected an explosion in gold prices higher this year or next, there would be no reason for wholesale purchases to exceed retail purchases by such a high margin (unless there is a facet of the wholesale gold market in mainland China I do not understand at all, and if so, I would welcome any mainland Chinese resident providing an explanation in the comments below as to why wholesale and retail gold demand would differ so tremendously).

Thus, in this case, without assuming the WGC is providing propaganda numbers and the SGE is not, there has been ample historical reason to assume that if anything, SGE gold demand data would be underreported. In the past, using publicly reported data of gold imports to Hong Kong from Switzerland as well as data about China gold imports, and in attempting to reconcile this data, it has been possible to determine that most gold that is imported into Hong Kong ends up in mainland China. From that point, due to the opacity of much gold reporting, it is more difficult to ascertain exactly where the imported Hong Kong gold ends up in mainland China, regarding the percentages that may be allocated to national reserves, wholesale consumption and retail consumption, simply because it is highly unlikely that the figures of annual gold production within the borders of China, that stay within national borders and are never exported, are accurate (likely in my opinion to be highly underreported).

Thus, given the opacity of the combined internal production of gold as well as total importation of gold from Switzerland and other unreported sources, it is impossible to tally the different allocations of gold consumption every year within China as the Chinese government likely considers these figures to be of national security. Furthermore, my observations about China gold data are likely to apply to publicly reported Russian gold data as well, further clouding the ability to calculate accurate annual global physical gold supply and demand figures.

Editor’s Note: Part 2 of this article, in which the author connects the dots of the above information to formulate conclusions about how the above should be interpreted moving forward for the short, intermediate and long-term, will be available to only Benefactor level skwealthacademy patreon members.

Please help us combat censorship by bookmarking and visiting/joining my other platforms: For those that would like similar, but much more in-depth analysis based upon my relentless pursuit of truth over mainstream financial propaganda, consider supporting me on the following platforms. All my content is 100% reader supported and writing of such articles would not be possible without reader support. To understand why I’m asking for your support if you are able to support me, due to relentless demonetization, shadowbanning and censorship, I literally earned less than $10.00 in advertising fees in total in seven years of posting videos to the YouTube platform on two channels that racked up more than 13,5 million views. For anyone that has financially benefited from the investment tips I’ve provided that have yielded large gains that wish to support me, the easiest way to do so is by visiting my gofundme campaign here. You may also join my substack newsletter for absolutely free right now by clicking here. For investment analysis and tips every week and month (including the identity of nine stocks I suggested buying less than six months ago that yielded on average, about 113% per stock upon my guidance to divest, and which will likely yield similar results in the very near future with a little patience), join my patreon platform here (only about 20 spots remain at the benefactor level, after which memberships will close). Subscribe for free to watch my investment videos here. Finally, to download a fact sheet to learn how my soon-to-be-launched Academy will radically alter business education forever, click here.